World - Reuters
Israel Urged to Change Stand on Geneva Convention
Date: Tue, Aug 24, 2004
By Mark Heinrich
JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Hoping to avoid sanctions, Israel's attorney general wants Israel to consider applying to Palestinians the Fourth Geneva Convention safeguarding the treatment of occupied people, a spokesman said Tuesday.
It was another sign of emerging Israeli disquiet about the risk of international sanctions following a World Court decision in July that declared illegal its West Bank barrier built across Palestinian farmland.
Israel has said previously the Geneva Convention's clauses on occupation do not apply to it because Jordanian and Egyptian control over the West Bank and Gaza before 1967 was not internationally recognized.
Some 3.6 million Palestinians live in the two territories which Israel captured in the 1967 Middle East war.
Israel says it does its best to heed humanitarian standards in Palestinian areas but Palestinians dispute this, pointing to Jewish settlements, roadblocks and other Israeli controls.
Attorney General Menachem Mazuz last week urged the right-wing government to reroute its barrier swiftly to minimize the risk of sanctions, and the High Court gave it 30 days to issue a statement on the ramifications of the World Court decision.
A Justice Ministry spokesman said Mazuz now wanted the government to "deeply consider" the possibility of adopting the 1949 Convention, which forbids abuses of civilians in conflict zones and transferring citizens of an occupying power onto captured territory.
But Israel is seen as unlikely to embrace the Convention in the near term as this could be tantamount to recognizing that its Jewish settlement enterprise is illegal.
A senior security source criticized the opinion. "We have not changed our diplomatic or political point of view. If Israel were to adopt the convention in its own context, it would tie the military's hands in fighting terrorism," he said.
However, a senior political source said Mazuz's stance reflected Israeli concerns "about repercussions from the World Court decision because of the effect on international public opinion."
Israel says the planned 600 km (360 mile)-long barrier, of which some 200 km have been built, is aimed at stopping Palestinian suicide bombers from reaching its cities.
Palestinians, who launched an uprising in 2000, denounce the project as a precursor to annexing territory, which could thwart their aspirations to a viable state promised by a troubled U.S.-backed peace plan.
BARRIER'S ROUTE
Significant sections of the barrier charted so far would take in a string of Israeli settlements containing most of the 240,000 Jews who have moved into the West Bank and Gaza since the 1967 Middle East war.
Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz, reacting to Israel's own High Court, this week approved a new path for a segment of the barrier which would fence off less than half the 8,500 acres affected by its original course.
The court had ordered the government not to separate West Bank Palestinians from their livelihoods, schools and hospitals.
In fresh violence in Gaza, Israeli soldiers shot dead a 20-year-old farmer Tuesday, medics said. A military source said soldiers had opened fire to thwart a bombing near a crossing with Israel.
In Israeli prisons, a Palestinian hunger strike for better conditions went through its 10th day and Israel declared its hospitals off-limits to any of the 2,800 inmates on the liquids-only fast who might fall ill.
Despite the tensions, the Israeli and Palestinian foreign ministers made plans to hold a rare meeting Thursday at an Italian interfaith conference, sources in Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom's office said.
SOURCE
FAIR USE NOTICE
This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.