FBI whistleblower 'vindicated' over intelligence services failings


Independent UK
 Date: 01-14-05

By Andrew Buncombe in Washington

The credibility of Sibel Edmonds, the former FBI translator who claimed that evidence gathered before 11 September revealed al-Qa'ida was planning to attack America, was boosted yesterday by a report issued by the US Justice Department.

A report by the department's senior oversight official, Glenn Fine, said that other accusations made by Mrs Edmonds relating to poor standards in the FBI's translation department and possible espionage, were supported by witnesses and other evidence. The official said even today the FBI had not properly investigated the claims. "We found that many of Edmonds' core allegations relating to the [espionage allegation] were supported by either documentary evidence or witnesses other than Edmonds," the report said.

Last year Mrs Edmonds, 34, a former contract linguist who had "Top Security" clearance, revealed to The Independent that information she saw while working at the FBI showed there was a substantial amount of evidence gathered prior to 11 September that suggested al-Qa'ida was planning to attack.

Mrs Edmonds was fired from her job in March 2002 after she complained to the FBI about shoddy wiretap translations and informed them that an interpreter with a relative at a foreign embassy might have compromised national security by blocking translations in some cases and notifying some targets about US surveillance of them.

Yesterday's report said the FBI failed to investigate these matters. Mrs Edmonds said she felt vindicated and would be calling on Congress to pursue the matter. Shehas filed a federal lawsuit seeking to retain her job.

Source

FAIR USE NOTICE

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.